Julian Assange of Wikileaks has told Forbes magazine he plans to publish bank internal documents that would take down “one or two” major banks in the USA, according to the Wall Street Journal.

What he omits to say is that taking down one or two major banks will also take down the entire financial system in the process, causing a bank run and chaos comparable with 1931. An irresponsible call for a bank run on December 7th is also being made by Max Keiser -the same Max Keiser who admitted to selling his office space in the WTC just before 9/11 on a radio show. Keiser also doesn’t warn people that a bank run will cause the immediate collapse of the economy, the closure of banks, leaving people without money or food.

Who benefits from such a catastrophe that anyone with a basic understanding of economics can foresee?

The euro is crumbling at an extraordinary speed. The break up of the eurozone could bring down the European Union and, in the process, its architects – the powerful banks and dynasties like the Royal House of the Netherlands.

Engineering an economic collapse in order to implement emergency measures that are already in place and even martial law might be one way of saving the eurozone and the European Union for the bankers and corporations.

Is Assange really a cointelpro agent about to carry out a “false flag” economic crime? Surely, you have to ask what his motive is for destroying the global economy under the pretext of wanting to inform people about yet more corruption at banks that we all know about anyway from probes, investigations etc

Anyone who looks at the current Wikileaks “revelations” finds mostly “gossip” or items often in the mainstream news. What is there really worth reporting? Why is this trivial news all over the front pages of the corporate controlled media and why is it being promoted by news outlets known to have been a part of the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird to control information in the public domain?

We hear from the Wikileaks that Germany’s Defence Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg is considered a “good friend of America” But he is a member of the European Council of Foreign Relations, after all, so that is no surprise.

We learn that Prince Andrew cannot make up his mind whether to scold journalists and police for pursuing corruption or whether to scold countries like France for being corrupt. But he is a minor royal and never claimed to have a coherent world view.

We hear UN employees are spied on when it is pretty well known many are spies.

When I did a search through the Wikileaks data for items related to Austria, the only document that came up was a “cable” in which it was claimed that the Iranians were hiding plans for a nuclear reactor.

Because I had an acquaintance who worked for the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna sent as a cost free expert by te US government, I know that the assessment is that Iran’s nuclear programme is civilian and poses little threat. Why no leak of such a document on Wikileaks?

The “cable” about the nuclear reactor only furthers the agenda of the Globalists, who want more war in the Middle East. They gave the corporate media an excuse to shift the focus from the eurozone crisis.

Have the controllers of Assange now decided to go one step further given the speed at which the eurozone is unravelling? Have they decided they must have martial law and fast? Who better placed to implement the false flag economic crime than Assange, who is being hounded by all the governments but who is never caught or stopped? How come Assange hasn’t considered the consequences of taking down a bank or two and bringin the economic system to a standstill when no preparations have been made?

And why is Forbes magazine, the ultimate Globalist news outlet, cheerfully publishing Assange’s warning he is about to put into the public data that will cause a bank run and collapse of the economy overnight -and crucially triggering emergency law or even martial law.

Read more about this financial crime by Assange at:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703994904575647180698155858.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

NOVEMBER 29, 2010

Bank’s Stock Declines on WikiLeaks Anticipation

By DAN FITZPATRICK

Bank of America Corp.’s stock dropped more than 3% Tuesday on speculation that website WikiLeaks would soon release internal documents.

The Charlotte, N.C., lender, the nation’s largest bank as measured by assets. has been trying to determine for more than a year whether any documents were leaked from inside the bank, said people familiar with the situation. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange asserted in an October 2009 Computerworld magazine interview that he had the 5GB computer hard drive of a Bank of America executive.

“We have no evidence that supports this assertion,” a bank spokesman said Tuesday. “We are unaware of any new claims by WikiLeaks that pertain specifically to Bank of America.”

WikiLeaks has gained world-wide attention for disseminating sensitive diplomatic documents. Mr. Assange told Forbes magazine that a release of “tens or hundreds of thousands of documents” in early 2011 would reveal “flagrant violations” and “unethical practices” at a major U.S. bank, according to the interview posted online Monday. He didn’t name the institution, but at least one banking analyst pointed to BofA as a probable target in light of the earlier Computerworld interview.

The bank’s shares closed at $10.95, down 36 cents, on the New York Stock Exchange.

Few financial institutions have been under more public scrutiny than Bank of America, with thousands of pages of emails, notes and sensitive regulatory conversations aired via congressional hearings and investigations.

The circumstances surrounding the acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co. became the subject of several state and federal probes. New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has a civil fraud case pending against the bank, one of its executives and former Chief Executive Officer Kenneth Lewis. The suit alleges they misled investors about losses at Merrill before the acquisition closed.